top of page

Cases in the US:
Online Grooming

Written by Hyunjae Cho

This research paper dives into the problems with the growing cases regarding online grooming in the United States and possible solutions. The United States currently faces a significant increase in online grooming cases, and this is no standard grooming case. Online grooming has its way of incognitizing the predator while still bringing a detrimental impact on the prey/victim. Regarding this major threat to the safety of many people, this paper emphasizes the need for more improvements in the judicial system, which is still adapting to the new online version of grooming.

3bed1f895ad4adc3b6c6b0f3e2de576a.jpeg

INTRODUCTION

The United States is always in shock with many different crimes happening across the nation, and one of them is Online grooming. The United States had a recent boom in Online Grooming cases, putting many people in danger. While the government and FBI try to search for ways to prevent this deadly crime, not much has changed for the nation as daily, a significant number of children are sexually harassed or killed by online groomers. People likely know the concept of grooming, but online grooming is a way adults use fake profiles to befriend children or teens online to, at the end, sexually harass them or kill them. ​​Research has been done to discover the current situation with online grooming in this nation and fixes that need to be made.

CURRENT SITUATION

Online grooming, often known as the online counterpart of grooming, is a new trend for many groomers/predators across the united states, and the nation has recently been in shock of the increase in cases across this land. Online groomers are often called predators as they search for their prey online, and it is shocking to realize that there are an estimated 500,000 online predators active each day in the United States. This staggering number can show how severe this situation is, as 500,000 or more children and teenagers may be in danger. Young children, especially the ones who are going through puberty, are the ones most prone to such danger as the FBI presents; over half of the victims of online grooming were between the age of 12 and 15. Children who still need more parental education and maturity mostly fall in danger by accessing the internet, which gives groomers a chance to approach them. It is no coincidence that 4 percent of the 2000 children aged between 11 - 17 have been asked to send sexual content to adults online, according to a survey done by NSPCC. The problems also reach the judicial side as Grooming cannot be explicitly prosecuted until there is sexual conduct according to US laws. This means online predators who have the intention of harassing a child cannot be punished until there is sexual conduct between the groomer and the victim. This leads to only a tiny portion of the groomer number being punished rightly. The fact that this crime is done online also requires more challenges for the FBI, as tracking down people online is problematic in many ways. Online grooming has brought significant threats to children across the United States.

PROCESS IN ONLINE GROOMING

Online grooming goes through a very structured step to be prosecuted. Groomers most likely use similar tactics to bring the child into their hands. The first step that groomers take is targeting, where groomers would specifically select their targets. They scroll through social media, messaging apps, and chat functions in online games to search for children. They would fake their profile and start to chat with the child and gain a bit of trust by helping and supporting the child. The second step is engaging and gathering information. Online Groomers would listen to the disabilities and problems a victim has in school and will tailor his or her answers and advice. This stage affirms the possibility of online grooming as this stage confirms if the predator will approach the child. Trust building is the main focus in this stage as predators will give lots of compliments, especially about a child’s appearance, to win the child over and to gain their trust. Predators will look to build a give-and-take relationship with the victim by buying them presents. The forms of those presents would be gaming credits and online vouchers that don’t leave any physical paper trail. The third step would be identifying and exploiting needs. Since now the predators know everything they need to know about the child, they begin identifying weaknesses or vulnerabilities to dig into. They would tailor their characteristics for the most effective outcome. For example, if the target is a female teenager, then a predator’s profile would be an attractive young age guy. During this stage, the victims would break down their defenses, possibly allowing the predators to steer the conversation into whatever path they want. The fourth step is testing the boundaries. Before bringing up their pure purpose, the predators go through a stage of testing. They would test whether a child can keep a secret from their parents while diving deeper into more personal questions (as boundaries have been taken down), such as the child’s personal schedule and location. The fifth step is isolation and desensitization. To capture the child in their hands, predators aim to influence conflict or force a distant relationship between the child and those typically closest. (most likely their parents) This makes them more in need of support and care, which the predators would temporarily provide at this stage. This would influence the child to be distant, isolated, and less likely to share information about the predator's actions online. This would be the last stage of filtering out which child to groom. For example, if the child acts out of character and mutes when they typically wouldn’t, this could be a “telltale” sign for the groomer, and they would back off. The sixth step is sexualization. In this stage, groomers enact various tactics to bring the relationship from a friendship to a sexual relationship. They would send inappropriate images to the child to normalize the situation or verify their trustworthiness. Then the groomer would request pictures of the victim’s body parts in return, and once the victim sends the photos, they fall into a trap. From then some predators would ask to meet in person or online. The last step in online grooming is controlling and initiating abuse, where the predator would threaten or blackmail the victim into forcing this relationship to be in secrecy and to ensure that they remain in contact. The victim has given too much to the predator, which indicates they have too much to lose if they tell their parents or the police. If the child does start refusing, the predator reminds them of all the inappropriate materials or conversations that they have shared. These groomers overly go through a very complex step to win over the child and abuse them in many ways.

REAL CASES

One real case of online grooming on a child could be told through Breck Bednar’s Story.  Breck would play games online. His schoolmates persuaded him to join a virtual clubhouse or online gaming group when he was 14 years old. There was a gaming screen where they might be in combat, a screen with icons for the males who were online, and a screen for live chat with whatever they were talking about. In the room was a ringmaster named Lewis Daynes Breck, and his pals were familiar with the other members, but they didn't know Lewis Daynes in person. He claimed to be a 17-year-old computer engineer in a multimillion-pound business. He occasionally spent time working for the US government in New York. Occasionally, he was in Dubai or traveling to Syria. Daynes appeared to Breck, who still had his baby teeth and perceived no evil in the world. Later Lewis kept in contact with Breck and would give him advice like a big brother. As Break gets closer to Lewis, he becomes more detached from his family. One day Lewis told Breck he wanted to see him in person, so he sent a car for Breck to ride to his house. Naive Breck got into the car and drove to Lewis’s house, and as soon as he entered his house, Lewis cut Breck’s throat, and that was how Breck Bednar, at the age of 14, died. This case represents one of many more Online Grooming cases across the United States. Thankfully Brock's mother, Lordin, was brave enough to share her story with the media to bring more awareness to this topic.

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS

Currently, in the United States, several laws legally punish online grooming. Depending on the extent of their sexual exploitation of juveniles (under 18), online grooming predators are subject to penalties or jail terms of up to 10 years under United States Federal Law. A predator who tries to exploit a youngster under the age of sixteen sexually may be fined or given a term of up to five years in prison. Also, according to the 18 U.S. Code § 2422 - Coercion and enticement, Anyone who knowingly induces, induces, entices, coerces, or induces another person to travel in interstate or foreign commerce or in any Territory or Possession of the United States to engage in prostitution or in any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a crime, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for a term of not more than 20 years, or both. These laws do punish online predators. However, there is still so much that needs to be done to prevent this significant problem of online grooming. First of all, there is a great need for more awareness. Currently, in the United States, only a few people know what online grooming is and its effects. At this stage, it is essential to bring more awareness to this topic by publishing articles and bringing this up in conversations. Second, there is a need for more specific laws on online grooming. There are laws on online grooming in the constitution; however, since online grooming is a relatively new crime, the number of laws are substantially lower than laws on just physical grooming. the drafting of more specific laws on online grooming would help punish all online groomers. Thirdly the FBI needs to develop a better way of catching and finding these online predators. Currently, their resources and speed of catching these criminals are slow. A development in the system of finding online groomers would help lower the cases of online grooming.

CONCLUSION

A Lot has already been done to fix this problem of online grooming; however, it is easy to say that there is still a long way to go. For this problem to go away, there is a need for more public awareness, judicial changes, and the development of ways to catch groomers online. Every single day a significant number of children are becoming victims of online grooming and so it is essential to emphasize the urgency of this problem.

bottom of page